Posts Tagged ‘Hubbard Hall’

“Don Pasquale”

Thursday, August 11th, 2011

Photos by Kevin Sprague©2011

While I can tell you that I thoroughly enjoyed the Hubbard Hall Opera Theater (HHOT)’s production of Donizetti’s Don Pasquale and thought that the orchestra and the singers sounded splendid, I do not have the expertise to analyze their artistry in depth. I can merely judge the entertainment value of the piece, which ranked high on my fun-o-meter, in spite of the language barrier.

Earlier this summer I announced the The Who’s Tommy was indeed an opera based on three criteria:
1) Wonderful music
2) Inscrutable plot
3) The need for supertitles to understand the lyrics

Using that litmus test, Don Pasquale is not an opera, because, while it has wonderful music and supertitles (Tommy, which was written and sung in English, did not) it actually has a comprehensible plot, albeit a very silly one, but the songs do spring directly from plot and character, so in that regard Don Pasquale is more 19th century Italian musical theatre than opera.

But it is undoubtedly an opera, and a very fine one, written by Gaetano Donizetto (1797-1848) at the very apex of his career. I mean, it is the 64th out of the 66 operas he wrote, and you don’t get to write that many operas unless you know what you are doing, and once you have written 63 it is a good bet that you are fairly proficient in the art. And so 158 years after its premiere in Paris in 1843, it is still widely performed.

It is an opera buffa or comic opera, which has its roots in commedia dell’arte, the only real differences being the lack of really outrageous physical comedy (hard to sing while being whacked with a sausage) and the sung-through musical score. The libretto, ostensibly by Giovanni Ruffini (1807- 1881), a condemned and exiled Italian poet living in Paris, is an adaptation of Angelo Anelli’s libretto for Stefano Pavesi’s Ser Marcantonio (1810), which in turn was based on Ben Jonson’s Epicene (1609). But I learned that Ruffini refused to have his name printed in the program for the premiere of Don Pasquale because of Donizetti’s extensive writing and rewriting in order to fir the lyrics to recycled music from his earlier works. No one said that it was EASY to write 66 operas!

(Click HERE to read the Italian libretto.)

Photos by Kevin Sprague©2011

Director/choreographer Heidi Lauren Duke has moved the action from 19th century Rome to Hollywood, USA, in the heyday of silent films, another comedic genre that leaned heavily on supertitles and broadly drawn commedia-style characters. Of course, there is nothing silent about a full-blow opera with a 14 piece orchestra, but wisely assuming that the majority of the audience will not speak Italian, Duke has presented the story as if we need that much help to understand the plot. I don’t know about the rest of you guys, but I do!

Brief plot synopsis: The large, rich, and elderly Don Pasquale (Brace Negron) decides to teach his handsome young nephew Ernesto (Glenn Seven Allen) a lesson by disinheriting him and taking a wife. His physician, Dr. Malatesta (Andrew Bawden) apparently helps out by providing a bride in the person of his sister, fresh from the convent. Ernesto regrets the loss of his inheritance, but he is heartsick to have to break things off with his beloved, the beautiful widow, Norina (Vedrana Kalas) and saddened by what he considers the treachery of Dr. Malatesta, who he thought to be his friend. Soon we find out that the Doctor has enlisted Norina play the role of his sister to teach Don Pasquale a lesson. No sooner is the (false) marriage contract signed than she morphs into Bride-zilla, spending the good Don’s money like water, disobeying his order to stay home in the evenings, and arranging a rendez-vous with a lover in the garden. Eventually Ernesto gets in on the plot, and Don Pasquale is disabused of any further ideas of marrying and producing heirs in his old age.

Photos by Kevin Sprague©2011

The four leads could not be better suited to their roles. My only tiny quibble is that Negron is obviously considerably younger than the 70 Don Pasquale claims, but I am sure that is inevitably the case. It is a given that these folks can sing, but I was very pleased to see that they could act too. Kalas, who is a resident of nearby Delmar, NY, is a particularly saucy and attractive Norina. I understand that this is considered a particularly showy coloratura role, and Kalas made it look and sound like great fun.

Allen, who I see is billed as a “Broadway star” from having originated the role of
Giuseppe in Adam Guettel’s The Light in the Piazza, has a particularly powerful voice. I loved him in his natty golf gear, and enjoyed the light humor he brought to what could have been a fairly standard role for a handsome tenor.

Negron and Bawden also handled their comedy well, and Negron seemed comfortable in the “fat suit” he wore for the role. Bawden was appropriately narrow and mustachioed as the dapper doctor.

Photos by Kevin Sprague©2011

There is a lively chorus and Duke had them doing some fun and funny things. Some of the chorus members, including James McAdams unctuous and silly Notary, are part of the HHOT Select Conservatory program and will be appearing in Dido and Aeneas at Hubbard Hall on August 19 & 20 at 8 p.m.

Jason Dolmetsch designed the handsome set, and the attractive and often amusing costumes are by Sherry Racinella. You never know how Hubbard Hall will be arranged from one production to the next, and this time the set-up is fairly standard, with the steeply raked rows of seats on the floor in front of the balcony facing the stage. The Hubbard Hall stage is a very pretty one with its original ornate cravings and molding surrounding the proscenium, and it fits in nicely with the silent film era setting. Although it was closed from the 1920s to the 1970s, there were probably a couple of “flickers” screened there in the early 20th century.

Photos by Kevin Sprague©2011

There is also a U-shaped ramp enveloping the orchestra under the baton of Maria Sensi Sellner, director of the Akron Symphony Chorus. The assembled musicians give a very polished performance and part of the fun of the open dress rehearsal was getting to observe while they rehearsed a few problematic sections of the score.

In this part of the theatrical world we get excited if there are more than two or three people in the pit for a musical. To hear a REAL ORCHESTRA is a rare treat. And to hear singers who can be heard loud and clear for blocks away with no artificial amplification, that is not only a treat, it makes one wonder why many “musical theatre” performers, who are only completing with a couple of instruments hidden away backstage have to be miked. Hubbard Hall is not a large space, but most of the time the singers are projecting OVER the orchestra which is situated between them and the audience. That is why these folks are called Professionals.

I like being able to drive through the beautiful fields of Washington County, with the Green Mountains and Adirondacks looming in the distance, to see a professional operatic production on the stage of an 1878 wooden opera house http://www.hubbardhall.org/about/history for a mere $30. I like that HHOT is founded and administered by a woman, Alexina Jones, and is employing a female director and conductor this year. I like that Norina is a smart and sassy woman who is not shy about going out and getting what she wants.

And I especially like that Jones specifically selects family-friendly operas and keeps ticket prices reasonable to encourage people to introduce young people to the wonderful world of opera through her productions. I can’t imagine anyone not having fun at this lively and attractive production.

Click HERE for a complete photo gallery for this production.

Hubbard Hall Opera Theater (HHOT) presents Don Pasquale, sung in Italian with English supertitles, on August 12, 13 and 18 at 8 p.m. and August 20 and 21 at 2 p.m. on Hubbard Hall’s mainstage at 25 East Main Street in Cambridge, NY. The show runs two and a half hours with one intermission and is suitable for the whole family. Tickets are priced at $30 general, $25 members, $20 students, and may be obtained by visiting www.hubbardhall.org or by calling 518-677-2495.

“Merrily We Roll Along”

Sunday, May 15th, 2011

Frankie Kraft as Charley Kringas, Joshua Gray as Franklin Shephard, and Meg Ward as Mary Flynn star in Kevin McGuire's production of "Merrily We Roll Along at Hubbard Hall. Photo: Jonathan Barber

There are two important reasons to go see Merrily We Roll Along at Hubbard Hall:
1. It’s very good
2. If you are a theatre geek like me, you can carve another notch on your belt for having seen a full production of an obscure Sondheim musical. Serious bragging rights are involved here!

I am such a &$#% geek that I can tell you this is the SECOND full production of Merrily We Roll Along that I have seen, but no, I did not see the original blink-and-you-missed-it 1981 Broadway production. I had just gotten married but I suspect that I would have thrown bridegroom and bouquet aside and hightailed it to the Dover Plains train station in a heartbeat if the opportunity to see the new Sondheim show had presented itself, except that I was the thick of directing H.M.S. Pinafore at the time.

Sandwiched between the Tony Award winning Sweeney Todd (1979) and the Pulitzer Prize winning Sunday in the Park with George (1984), Stephen Sondheim and Hal Prince collaborated on a musical adaptation of a 1934 comedy by George S. Kaufman and Moss Hart, Merrily We Roll Along. That the original had been a comparative flop for that hit-making team of the 1930’s perhaps should have been a sign to the hit-making team of the 1970’s. The original Broadway production ran a scant 16 performances, and its failure prompted Sondheim to announce he was leaving the theatre to write video games.

I saw a student production at Williams College in 1996, and it was very good. Sondheim and librettist George Furth intended this show for young performers, and so Merrily… is an ideal choice for an ambitious college theatre. Of course, Sondheim is a Williams alumnus (class of 1950), but by the late 1990’s there was increased interested in Merrily We Roll Along with several major regional revivals, and the composer has continued to tweak the work throughout the intervening years. So while I obviously did not see the award-winning 2000 London version being presented at Hubbard Hall, I saw something much closer to it than to the 1981 original.

The score of Merrily We Roll Along has never gone out of favor. Despite the original productions “failure” a cast album was released and I think you will find some of the songs quite familiar as the have entered the Sondheim Cabaret oeuvre and frequently performed. At Hubbard Hall they are most ably performed by a lively cast and a four piece band led by Richard Cherry, who are perched above the action in the balcony. (The audience is seated in tiers in front of the stage, facing the back of the hall, and the performance is on the floor.)

Merrily We Roll Along has a happy ending only because it ends at the beginning.

The show chronicles two decades in the life of Franklin Shephard (Josh Gray) and his friends, only it plays them backwards. We meet Frank in 1976 at a miserable, drink-sodden forty. He is at the pinnacle of worldly success as a Hollywood producer, but his personal life is a shambles as his second marriage, to Gussie Carnegie (Amy Northup), is disintegrating. He is not speaking to his closest friend Charey Kringas (Frankie Kraft) nor his first wife Beth (Kara Cornell) and their son Frank, Jr. (Cole Boggan). Mary Flynn (Med Ward), the only friend to have stood by him, is literally drowning in drink and unrequited love. Once a best-selling author, she is now a washed-up has-been.

The trouble with this show is that it starts with such a cacophony of misery amidst young actors stretching to play a nebulous middle-age that generally eludes them. It is no surprise that, as the show takes us back through their lives to the day in 1957 when Frank and Charley meet Mary on the rooftop of a Columbia dorm (or a building which rents to students) as they scan the skies for Sputnik and dream of their futures, that the emotional load lightens and the actors become more comfortable in their younger roles.

The full cast of "Merrily We Roll Along" at Hubbard Hall. Photo: Jonathan Barber

Director Kevin McGuire has assembled a fairly young cast, although not the teenagers that Sondheim and Furth first envisioned – a mixture of NYC-based actors and local folks. Sadly, Gray as Franklin is the weakest of the leads. His look is too pale and boyish (no make-up tricks are used to age the actors here) and his voice is thin in the upper registers. McGuire has him spend a lot of time staring soulfully at the audience, which got old fast.

On the other hand Kraft, Ward, Cornell, and Northup are delightful. Kraft captures attention early on with a strong delivery of Franklin Shephard, Inc. one of those numbers in which Sondheim captures so perfectly the vibratory energy of human anger.

Ward is the clear star of the show, riveting attention from the very start. Her looks hit the perfect balance between beauty (she has a wonderful, crinkly smile!) and quirkiness, and are a fine counterpoint to Northup’s blonde bombshell curves and Cornell’s cool preppy order. Northup does the best job of transforming herself from a forty-something star clinging to her golden youth to a twenty-something secretary on the make. Cornell, whose character is introduced late in the first act in an angry moment during Frank and Beth’s divorce proceedings, quickly catches us up on Beth’s story arc and makes her a winning and sympathetic addition to the team by the show’s end.

Peter Delocis is perfectly cast as Gussie’s first husband Joe Josephson, who produces Frank and Charley’s shows and then loses both his wife and his success to his protégés.

The rest of the company play a variety of supporting roles and assist with the scene changes. Karen Koziol has designed an interesting non-set, backed by two huge photographic drops depicting the area around the Manhattan Bridge* in New York City. The Hollywood sign twinkles from the balcony rim during the first scene. And moveable scenery pieces notably include both an upright and a grand piano.

Koziol has also designed the costumes and here she is much less successful. Granted there are a LOT of costume changes and TCHH is not a big budget operation, but the costumes are mostly street clothes and the 1976-1957 time period contains some signature fashion looks that could have been affordably incorporated by borrowing judiciously from a vintage clothing collection or having an able seamstress (why this that word so gender specific?) whip up a few key pieces. So where the costumes could have helped tell the story, they merely befuddled those hoping for visual cues to the era.

I wasted a whole lot of time during the first act carefully doing mental math to make sure I knew how old the central characters were supposed to be in each scene. Then at intermission I discovered that they have kindly put all that in the program for you. So don’t distract yourself the way I did!

I am always amazed and eternally grateful that I live in a region where a 40-60 minute drive over majestic mountains or through scenic cornfields brings me to some place where I can see exciting theatre, up close and personal, for a very reasonable ticket price. Don’t let the original “failure” of this piece put you off. Having seen it twice, I feel pretty strongly that the New York theatre community was just out to knock Sondheim down a peg in 1981 and this show came along in the wrong place at the wrong time. There is nothing wrong with this property and almost everything right with this production. Go see it!

The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall’s production of Merrily We Roll Along runs from May 12-June 4 at Hubbard Hall, 25 East Main Street in Cambridge, NY. The show runs two and a half hours with one intermission and is suitable for mature teens and adults. Performances are scheduled for: May 12 (Pay What You Will / Open Rehearsal) at 8 p.m., May 13, 14, 20, 21, 27 28, and June 3 and 4 at 8 p.m.; May 15, 22, and 29 at 3 p.m.; and June 4 at 2 p.m. Tickets are $22 for Hubbard Hall members, $25 for non-members and $15 for students and children. Tickets are available at www.hubbardhall.org or by calling 518-677-2495.

* As a native New Yorker who grew up by the turbid waters of Hell’s Gate, I pride myself on knowing my City bridges, and the identity of the bridge on the backdrop was a matter of considerable debate between me and my companion before the start of the show. The bridge most visible from the Columbia area at 110th street would, of course, by the George Washington.

“The Madwoman of Chaillot”

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

Kim Johnson Turner (left) as the President of International Substrate of Paris., Inc., and Christine Decker (Right) as Countess Aurelia, the Madwoman of Chaillot. Photo provided.

Kim Johnson Turner (left) as the President of International Substrate of Paris., Inc., and Christine Decker (Right) as Countess Aurelia, the Madwoman of Chaillot. Photo provided.


I hate plays in translation. I especially hate French plays in translation. Well, let’s face it, the French and the English have never gotten along, why should their languages? Whenever I attend a performance of an English version of a French play I feel as if I am hearing only the merest hint of the playwright’s artistry and intention – as if I am wearing earmuffs and a veil that I cannot remove.

It doesn’t help that Jean Giraudoux (1882-1944) wrote The Madwoman of Chaillot (1943) as a romantic fantasy, or that we have only one English translation, pardon me, “adaptation,” of the work to hand – the 1949 effort by Maurice Valency (1903-1996) – or that in the Hubbard Hall production a dozen actors must suffice where the original Broadway production used twice that number. The result is that the beginning of Act I is baffling as performers switch roles rapidly and director John Hadden allows lines, songs, and actions to overlap making it all the more difficult for the audience to decipher who is who and accustom themselves to the rhythm of the Giraudoux/Valency style.

After that rocky start the arrival of the Countess Aurelia, the Madwoman of the title, played by Christine Decker, is a great relief. In my script she has her first line on page 17. It seemed longer than that on opening night. As soon as we meet her and see all the other characters in relation to her, the play, and this production, begin to take shape.

The action of the play takes place in the Chaillot (pronounced Shy-oh) section of Paris, currently located in the city’s 16th arrondissement. The Madwoman owns the Chez Francis café, in which the first act takes place, and all of the people who work there and frequent it are her friends. There is the Waiter (Benjie White), the waitress, Irma (Aleda Bliss), the Deaf-Mute (James Branagan), the Doorman (Christopher Barlow), the Ragpicker (Tom Melcher), the Police Sergeant (Peter Delocis), the Flower Girl (Keelye St. John), etc. They are the common people, the dreamers. We see them in stark contrast to corporate types – the President (Kim Johnson Turner), the Baron (Erik Barnum), and the Prospector (Doug Ryan) – who occupy a table at the café while they scheme to get at the oil they believe to be beneath the streets.

The Prospector’s plan to blow up the Office of the City Architect across the street to get at the oil fail, and Pierre (Richard Howe), his flunky who was to have detonated the bomb, tries to drown himself in the Seine rather than face the consequences. A young gendarme (Jason Dolmetsch) rescues him and Aurelia, seeing a resemblance between Pierre and her long-lost love Adolphe Bertaut, takes him under her wing. She sets him straight about the pleasures and value of life, and he and the rest of the café crowd explain to her how the world has changed and what the corporate types are up to.

While the first act is bifurcated and dense, the second act, which is set in the cellar of Aurelia’s home, is direct and delightful. It begins with Aurelia’s consultation with the Sewerman (Doug Ryan) about where a secret staircase may lead, and progresses to a tea-party madder than any hatter could dream up as Aurelia entertains her fellow Madwomen – Constance (Kim Johnson Turner) and Gabrielle (Jason Dolmetsch) and eventually Josephine (Keelye St. John). With the help of all the café folks they try the “wreckers of the world’s joy” – represented by the Ragpicker – in absentia and find them guilty, so when they arrive, lured by a vial of kerosene and water that Aurelia has sent them as a sample, they are all neatly dispatched down the endless stairway to…well, you can guess where an endless stairway into the hot and fiery bowels of the earth might lead, can’t you?

This was Giraudoux’s final play and he did not live to see it performed, but Hadden’s program note makes it sound as if he scrawled it while he lay dying during the Nazi occupation of France. He was in fact a healthy man serving as the Minister of Information when he wrote the play. He died suddenly of kidney failure on January 31, 1944. The probable cause was food poisoning, which has led to legends that he was deliberately poisoned by the Nazis. Whatever the cause, his passing was swift and unexpected, and La Folle* de Chaillot was completed long before it happened. Sentimental though it might be to consider this optimistic tale a dying writer’s love-letter to the world, it simply isn’t so.

That this is an allegory is made plain by Giraudoux’s choice to give so few of his characters proper names. He only wants us to see the four Madwomen, Pierre, and Irma as real people about whom we should care. But the combination of the murkiness of the script and Hadden’s bizarre choice to cast Howe as Pierre destroy what Giraudoux intends to be the thread of young love and new life and hope for this old world. Howe is a handsome man and a fine actor, but he has not been young for a while now. He is clearly old enough to be Bliss’ father and when they kiss at the end it just feels wrong.

Bliss, on the other hand, is the very picture of youth and hope. Once she gets to settle down and play just one role (she also plays Therese and Dr. Jadin in Act I) her work is amiable and solid. This is the case with St. John as well. In Act I she is kept far too busy swapping costumes, but in Act II she presides magisterially over the mock trial as Josephine, the Madwoman of La Concorde, who knows about legal matters because her sister’s husband was a lawyer.

Decker truly anchors this production with a perfectly rational brand of insanity. Of course part of Giraudoux’s joke is that the “mad” people of the world are the only sane ones and what passes for sanity is a monstrous travesty. Here the Prospector asks “What would you rather have in your garden – an almond tree or an oil well?” The questioner’s opinion of your answer determines your sanity. I am sure we all know people who would answer “almond tree” and people who would answer “oil well” – all of whom consider themselves perfectly rational, although the people listening to their responses might have a different opinion.

Johnson Turner gets two very distinct and different roles to play. In Act I, in drag, she is the cigar-puffing President, and in Act II she is the defiant Constance, Madwoman of Plassy. Constance and Gabrielle apparently live together and have each other’s madness to blame for their own. Constance keeps an imaginary (invisible??) dog named Dickie, and Gabrielle keeps canaries, invites invisible (imaginary??) people to tea, and hears voices which have recently emigrated from her sewing machine to her hot water bottle.

Dolmetsch “in drag” was my favorite comic moment of the show, largely because he and Hadden have opted not to take it over the top. A tall, slender man with close cropped hair, Dolmetsch wears no wig or padding to play Gabrielle. He merely dons a slinky white sheath, plenty of pearls, a modest pair of pumps, and attaches a delightful emerald green poof of netting to the side of his head to transform into the virginal, modest and very ladylike Madwoman of St. Sulpice. Sadly, in this day and age many women would kill to have a bosom-less, hip-less figure like Dolmetsch’s.

Ryan does a nice job with his two, very different roles, neither of which contains the kind broad comedy for which he is best known. He is quite chilling as the Prospector and genial as the Sewerman. It is a pleasure to see Barlow back on stage after his debut last spring in Incorruptible. He and Delocis brought an easy, natural humor to their scenes with Aurelia in Act I.

Melcher, a TCHH newcomer, brings an easy aestheticism to the role of the Ragpicker, in which he also gets to display his musical and juggling skills. White, the long-time Executive Director of Hubbard Hall Projects, is always delightful in whatever minor roles he chooses to assay. Barnum, on the other hand, I always find a bit of a cypher on stage. He is handsome and competent, but I am not sure what he adds to the proceedings.

Branagan, who was raised in a bilingual household where both American Sign Language and English were spoken is a perfect fit for the role of the Deaf-Mute. Branagan points out that that term is no longer PC, but since the character proves himself neither deaf (he takes dictation from the Countess) nor mute (he speaks a line in Act II) that issue can be overlooked. It is a real treat to observe someone who “speaks” ASL as fluently as Branagan does. The word “fluent” obviously has its roots in words we commonly use to refer to the movement of fluids and that is how Branagan communicates, in a smooth stream of motions that flow like spoken language and without the outsized drama generally seen in ASL when it is used to interpret rather than express spoken language.

One of the best parts of going to a show at Hubbard Hall is finding out what role the space itself will play in each production. As I get to the top of the stairs I feel as if I am about to unwrap a Christmas present. Where will the seats be? What space or spaces will they use as performance space? Will the do something really nifty? And then I get to go in and ponder where best to sit as I take in the various angles and options.

Here set designer Karen Koziol has the audience mostly in tiers in front of the balcony facing the stage, although there are a few rows of seats on the side, making a three-quarters thrust out of the downstage area. Act I in played downstage in front of a series of quite tall, moveable flats painted with Parisian café scenes. Then at the end of intermission the company enters to remove those and reveal the rest of the hall and the stage representing Aurelia’s cellar. The tea party is set down stage, while the bowels of the cellar, and the ominous staircase leading down from it, are set on the stage proper, amidst pipes and the detritus of decades of the cast-off clutter of the well-lived life of a Madwoman. Greg Howe has provided seamless lighting for this large playing space.

This is 14-year-old Phoebe Martel’s first outing as head costume designer for a show, and she has done a fine job. I never would have guess the costumer was either a neophyte or so young. Aurelia’s costume is a special masterpiece of shred and patches which manages to combine many design elements while allowing Decker a good range of movement.

So we are back to where we started. There is much to like about this production – it looks great and there are lots of enjoyable performances – but it all begins and ends with the translation, which I don’t trust. If only I could get these $@#*% earmuffs off….

The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall (TCHH) production of The Madwoman of Chailliot will be performed November 11 (Pay What You Will / Open Rehearsal) at 8 p.m., November 12, 13, 19, 20, 26, 27, December 3 and 4 at 8 p.m., and November 14, 21, 28 and December 5 at 2 p.m. The show runs two hours and twenty minutes with one intermission and is suitable for ages 10 and up. Tickets are $22 for Hubbard Hall members, $25 for non-members and $15 for students and children. Tickets are available at www.hubbardhall.org or by calling (518) 677-2495. Hubbard Hall is an historic opera house located at 25 E. Main St. in Cambridge, NY.

* These days English speaking people are most familiar with the French word “Folle” in La Cage aux Folles and while the word is currently in use as a slang term for a flamboyant homosexual male, “Folle” is etymologically related to the English words fool and folly, and Giraudoux is using it in this sense.

“Another Antigone”

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

In the two weeks since I saw and reviewed Tina Packer’s Women of Will at Shakespeare & Company, people have been telling me that they won’t buy a ticket to see it because they believe they are too uneducated to enjoy it. “That’s a show for Shakespeare scholars, like you, Gail.” Any true Shakespeare scholar worth his or her salt would be doing a classic spit take to hear that. I am NOT a “scholar” of any ilk. I know a little bit of everything and a great deal of nothing.

And yet I am always wary of plays that assume too much of an audience because its no fun to sit in the theatre feeling dumb. I didn’t feel that way at Women of Will, I did at The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall’s production of A.R. Gurney’s Another Antigone. Tina Packer was telling me why she loved Shakespeare and I should too. Gurney was telling me that he went to Andover and Williams and Yale and spoke and read both Latin and Ancient Greek and I didn’t.

Granted, Gurney shares his own love and delight in the classics clearly through the character of Henry Harper, professor of classical literature at “a University in Boston” (are you sure it isn’t in Cambridge, Mr. Gurney?), who is played to perfection here by Philip Kerr, who also directed. But while I believed that Harper loved the classics and was able to instill that love in some of his students, I wasn’t taking one of his courses and neither was anyone else in the audience.

I don’t know how universal my experience is, but as a late Baby Boomer the place of classical language and literature were changing in the American educational world. Once considered mandatory for any educated individual, they were being moved into the realm of elective courses as I reached high school and college. I did have a year of Latin (taught by a sadly inebriated old maid who didn’t stay quite drunk enough to blot from her mind the reality that she had wasted her life teaching Latin to silly school girls) and of course read major works like the Iliad and the Odyssey and many of the plays, including Sophocles’ Theban cycle, in English*. But the classics as Gurney and his Professor Harper know and love them were no longer considered central.

Since the classics have not made a big revival in American education in the intervening decades (I’m sure they’re not on the MCAS or the Regents) it is safe to assume that the majority of the audience was in the same sad state of ignorance as I was.

So, quick refresher: Antigone was Oedipus’ daughter. Her two brothers, Eteocles and Polyneices, have killed each other in a battle over the throne of Thebes. Antigone is engaged to Haemon whose father, Creon, has ascended the throne and declared that while Eteocles shall be buried with all honor and ceremony, Polyneices’ body will be left as carrion on the battlefield. Antigone defies’ Creon’s orders and buries her brother’s body, incurring the death penalty.

This is Greek tragedy, so you will not be surprised to learn that just about everyone ends up dead, except Creon, who exiles himself. Gurney, through Harper, explains this as a fate worse than death to the community-centered Greeks.

This is the story as told by Sophocles in his tragedy Antigone written circa 442 BCE. “Another Antigone” opens with one of Harper’s students, Judy Miller (Erin Cousins), an ambitious senior who has already secured a position in a prestigious Wall Street training program in investment banking, presenting him with the script of her modern-day version of Antigone in lieu of her assigned term paper. Harper rejects it. Judy refuses to write the paper, insisting that her script is a scholarly effort that meets the requirements. Harper refuses to give her a passing grade without one. Without a passing grade she will not graduate and if she doesn’t graduate she loses her entrée to Wall Street. The battle of wills ensues, with Judy cast as Antigone and Harper as the inflexible Creon.

Gurney has conflated the roles of Haemon and Antigone’s sister, Ismene, into Judy’s soul mate, Dave Appleton (Jason Dolmetsch), a fellow senior feebly majoring in chemistry although his lack of ambition and interest make it obvious that it isn’t his life’s calling. Acting as the Chorus is Diana Eberhart (Sarah-Jane Gwillim), the University’s Dean of Humane Studies.

Judy decides to produce her Antigone and take her complaint against Harper to the University’s Grievance Committee. She enlists Dave to play the male lead and Dean Eberhardt to represent her before the committee. Her battle against the establishment consumes her whole being and radically alters her sense of self and perception of the world. While no blood is spilled (this is an A.R. Gurney play, after all) , at the end there is no doubt that the old Judy Miller is “dead.”

Harper does not undergo as complete a metamorphosis as Judy does, but he does come to see the error of his ways and vanishes. Whether he is dead or alive when the curtain falls is left a mystery, but that he has suffered that fate worse than death and been exiled from his community is indubitable.

The changes Dave goes through are far less plausible, and if Dolmetsch didn’t play him as such a gosh-darned likable fellow it would be evident that his is the most poorly drawn character on stage. I am not claiming that Dave Appleton is the first person to ever get within spitting distance of a degree in X and then realize that his first love was Y all along, I am saying that it is implausible that a lack-luster chemistry major who learned an affection for classical literature at his grandfather’s knee could suddenly, in his spare time, write the most brilliant paper on Antigone that Professor Harper has ever seen in all his many decades of teaching.

Dean Eberhardt alone remains unchanged by the events of the play. Whether this is because she has already reached her Nirvana or because she is stuck and cannot move I am not sure.

It would be hard to imagine a better cast. Kerr, as I have mentioned, is perfection. Gurney has a lot to say about academia (he taught in the Humanities department at MIT) and Kerr, who is himself a Harvard graduate and the Claribel Baird Halstead Professor of Theatre at the University of Michigan, knows exactly who Henry Harper is. If you ever went to college, you will too.

The cast renders each character as likeable, intelligent, and sympathetic, even Cousins’ combative Judy helps us understand her humanity and youthful passions. Dolmetsch doesn’t succeed in rendering two-dimensional character in 3-D, but you genuinely like his Dave and cheer for him to follow his heart.

Like Kerr, Gwillin nails the type of female academic administrator to a T. Once again, if you went to college, you will recognize Dean Eberhart. No one is credited with the costume design, but the clothing goes a long way towards helping to define each character, and, in Judy’s case, her emotional evolution.

There is an aspect of the play that I haven’t mentioned, and that is the vague and then specific accusations of anti-Semitism leveled against Professor Harper. Judy is Jewish and Dean Eberhard tells us she is Jewish on her mother’s side. Harper likes to compare and contrast the ancient Greek and Hebrew civilizations and writings in his lectures. Because he is a classicist, as opposed to a Hebraic scholar or a theologian, he likes the Greeks better. That’s his job.

When Judy is told of the complaints about Harper being an anti-Semite, which doesn’t occur until halfway into the play, her Jewish identity suddenly springs to the fore. Not her Jewish faith, but her place as a part of an historically persecuted people. The battle of wills between her and Harper suddenly becomes a matter of religious persecution.

Religion plays an important role in Sophocles’ play – Creon wants to prevent Antigone from performing a religious rite, which begs the question of who is angering the gods more – him for placing himself above the proscribed state religion or her for defying the state itself. But 20th century American academia (the play is set in “the present” but the technological references make it clear that that present is the late 1980’s when Gurney wrote the play) is scrupulously free of religion. From my point of view, the religious aspect of “Another Antigone” is discomforting, although it does allow for some eerily timely remarks about the United States’ relationship with Israel. Professor Harper and Helen Thomas would obviously have much to talk about.

Again, no one is credited with the set design, so I assume Kerr took the helm there as well. Turning the space in the Freight Depot Theater on its side to bring actors and audience in very close proximity. Four faceless life-sized soft-sculpture figures sit on the shallow steps along the back side of the playing space, and a bench, a desk, chair, and file cabinet, and a podium create separate spaces for students, faculty, an administration to perform.

My two complaints about this production are Peter J. Carrolan’s obnoxiously obvious lighting design, and the fact that this play was performed without an intermission. Gurney’s stage directions call for the show to be performed non-stop, as Sophocles’ Antigone was, but he does indicate where an intermission can be inserted if one is deemed necessary. According to my rear-end, an intermission was definitely necessary. An hour and forty-five minutes is too long a stretch to sit on those chairs. I spent the last 15-20 minutes praying that the next scene would be the final one, which is unfortunate because I was enjoying the play and the performances very much. If I had been given an intermission I would have been able to focus more on the play’s conclusion than on my own discomfort.

If you are a classicist and read or speak Latin and Ancient Greek, I imagine this play will fascinate you. If you are moderately ignorant, like me, you will still get a lot out of it. But if you can’t pronounce Antigone, you’d better stay home.

The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall‘s production of “Another Antigone” will be performed June 10 (Pay What You Will / Open Rehearsal) at 8 p.m., June 11, 12, 18, 19, 25, 26 at 8 p.m., and June 13, 20, 27 at 2 p.m. Tickets are $20 for Hubbard Hall members, $24 for non-members and $15 for students and children. Tickets may be reserved and purchased by calling (518) 677-2495

The show runs 105 minutes with no intermission and is too intellectually dense to be of interest to children under 14. However if you have a teen studying Sophocles, this would be a perfect show to take them to.

Hubbard Hall is an historic opera house located at 25 E. Main St. in Cambridge, NY. For information, visit www.hubbardhall.org

*Ironically, we were assigned to write our own Greek tragedies after reading Sophocles in school, and my effort, based on the Greek myth of Zeus’ ultimate overthrow of his father, Cronus, was deemed highly unsatisfactory, resulting in a tussle with my teacher. Apparently dramatizing a story that was both Greek and tragic did not a Greek tragedy make. Go figure!

“Incorruptible”

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

If we can’t do good with faith alone, then faith alone’s no good.

– Michael Hollinger, Incorruptible

Things are looking pretty gloomy at the French Abbey of Priseaux in 1250 CE, a time referred to as The Dark Ages in the subtitle and publicity for Michael Hollinger’s 1996 farce Incorruptible, but actually a little late to truly qualify for that moniker. People were beginning to see the light by then, in fact it was less than a century later that the term “Dark Ages” was coined, but there is no doubt that this is a dark comedy and that life is bleak indeed for the monks of Priseaux.

The bones of St. Foy lie on Priseaux’s shabby altar. She has been the Abbey’s patron Saint for three centuries, but she hasn’t produced a paying miracle or a pilgrim in 13 years, ever since Brother Charles (Richard Howe) became the Abbot. The trouble is that the Abbey at Bernay claims to have St. Foy’s relics too, and not only are the pilgrims, and their alms, flocking there, but the Pope has arrived to observe the miracles she is claimed to have wrought.

In reality St. Foy (c. 302 CE) was a virgin martyr whose name means Faith in Old French. Miracles attributed to her include curing blindness and freeing captives. Her relics reside in a statuary reliquary at Conques Abbey, where they have been ever since they were stolen from the monastery in Agen. That’s right, stolen. In 886 a brother from Conques was sent to join the order at Agen where he served faithfully for an entire decade before he was able to “liberate” St. Foy, and her lucrative pilgrims, to Conques.

The difference between the reality above and the fantasy Hollinger has concocted is that here there are two sets of bones – the one at Priseaux presumably genuine and the one at Bernay fake. We know they are fake because Jack (Christopher Restino), the one-eyed minstrel, confesses to digging up the bones of a pig farmer from the Bernay church yard and selling them, for 30 pieces of gold, to the Abbess, Agatha (Dianne O’Neill), who just happens to be Charles’ competitive and jealous sister.

The lynch pin on which this frenetic farce turns is the faith. The buying, selling, stealing, and faking of Christian holy relics was extremely common and well documented and this is because it was extremely profitable. To this day six different churches claim to possess the true head of John the Baptist. And miracles are attributed to all these relics – real and fake.

The Roman Catholic Church still authenticates miracles, although the process is much more thorough in this era of scientific miracles like carbon dating and DNA testing than it once was. But it takes much less than the Blessing of the Church to get people excited. In 2004 a 10-year-old grilled cheese sandwich (with a bite taken out of it) purported to bear the image of the Virgin Mary sold for $28,000 on E-bay.

So who can fault the Brothers of Priseaux for deciding to finance their operations with the selling of fakes relics? With Jack’s help they realize that their church yard contains hundreds of lucrative bones and they are at last able to afford decent meals, the repair of their chapel, and the continuation of their work, which is to help the poor, feed the hungry, and clothe the naked. While they do spend just smidgen of their funds on a little stained glass, Charles is steadfast in his adherence to the primary charitable mission of the order.

Charles has faith, although it is sorely tested. The local Peasant Woman (Liz Caspari) has the blind faith of the uneducated and thoroughly indoctrinated. Brother Felix (Caleb Rupp) has nothing but his faith, specifically in the relics of St. Foy, which he saves from being sold along with every other bone on the premises. Brother Martin (Doug Ryan) has faith in the capitalist system to rescue them from penury. And dim-witted Brother Olf (Christopher Barlow) has the uncomplicated faith of a child.

In the end several miracles occur. So, do the ends justify the decidedly grisly means? Just what is “faith” and how are “miracles” accomplished?

Hollinger (1962- ) holds a Bachelor of Music in viola performance from Oberlin and is quoted as saying: Plays are music to me; characters are instruments, scenes are movements; tempo, rhythm and dynamics are critical; and melody and counterpoint are always set in relief by rests—beats, pauses, the spaces in between. (Baker 2007)

I doubt that director Stephanie Moffett Hynds has ever read that statement because her production of Incorruptible plays at just one tempo and completely ignores Hollinger’s rests and pauses. The show opens at full throttle and rarely lets up, which when you are dealing with the tumble down the rabbit hole that is full-on farce, is exhausting. Not to mention loud! For the first time at Hubbard Hall I felt the actors’ voices bouncing off the wooden walls – as if each line was literally colliding with the next as the words caromed around in mid-air.

No one is less well served by this break-neck pacing than Ryan, an excitable and exciting physical comic of great talent. You don’t just give Doug Ryan his head and let him run, as Moffett Hynds has done here. You rein him in to help him set the pace. As Hollinger said: “…tempo, rhythm and dynamics are critical…” All are missing here and their absence spoils the fun of watching Ryan build from sanity to insanity and beyond. Moffett Hynds starts him on insane and just lets him wear himself, and the audience, down to the nubble of the numbness that results from over-stimulation.

Luckily the rest of the cast is better paced. They cannot possibly keep up with Ryan, so they trail in his wake, a relaxing situation that allows them the luxury of developing their own characters more fully. They are all fine performers and, in the case of Barlow and Caspari, manage to make more of Hollinger’s minor characters more than he has managed to create.

Caspari, like Ryan, is a strong physical comic – her background is in mime – and she gives the Peasant Woman, who Hollinger didn’t even bother to name, depth and interest. Barlow, who I think is making his stage debut here, is charming as a big, dull man who makes up for in heart, faith, and honesty what he lacks in smarts. I have to say that I was disappointed because, beside Barlow’s bio in the program, his character’s name is mistyped as Bother Olf, which I read as Bother Off and thought a delightful name for some medieval lacky. But he is Brother Olf, and a fine one at that.

Howe gains sympathy as the hen-pecked Abbot who lost faith in his father, a baker, when he stretched the flour with saw-dust after the price of grain rose precipitously. A tell-tale splinter ruined the family business and forced young Charles and Agatha into the church as their sole means of survival when all Charles really wanted to do was make bread. Jack, it turns out, has ambitions to be a baker too, and takes on that role when he joins the order, as Brother Norbert, setting up a nice relationship between him and Charles that bears fruit at the final curtain.

Restino starts off a little too mean as Jack (the eye-patch does grant an automatic piratical mania to his appearance, but grows into the role and finishes strong. Unfortunately, while Jack’s character is given a change to grow over the course of the play, that of his common-law wife and the Peasant Woman’s daughter, Marie (Christy Vogel) is not. She appears, masked, in the first act, and when she reappears bare-faced in Act II she is clothed and coiffed so differently that I couldn’t tell if she was a new character or the same young woman as before. She is not written very sympathetically and I had a hard time liking her, or even caring if she lived or died, which weakened the play’s denouement.

Once I figured out that Brother Felix was not a lech but a young man atoning for the supposed death of his true love, I enjoyed Rupp’s performance immensely and was glad to see his character receive a well deserved happy ending. My confusion about the character came in the first, frenetic scene, when Moffett Hynds had everything happening so fast and loud that I only caught the fact that Felix “had a weakness for the fairer sex” and something about buxom Italian women. When Rupp made his breathless entrance I failed to catch Felix’ true distress over the idea that the bones of St. Foy had really been taken to Bernay and his relief to find them still in situ.

The set – constructed and, I assume, designed by Howe, painted by Mary Grabarz, and decorated by Karen Koziol (who also did the props) – makes ingenious use of the curve of the Hubbard Hall balcony, as the company has once again reversed the playing space, seating the audience in tiers that ascend up on to the stage proper. You really feel as if you seeing a French Gothic monastery.

Except for the faux pas that renders Vogel unrecognizable at her second entrance, the costumes are nicely executed by Sherry Recinella. Jason Dolmetsch’s lighting and Neil Freebern’s sound design are solid and unobtrusive.

An incorruptible, which is what Brother Martin finally promises the Pope to lure him, and his attendant pilgrims to Priseaux, is the body of a saint so pure and holy that it does not decay. If you Google “incorruptible saints” you will find quite a list of claimed incorruptibles, with accompanying photographs. The bones of St. Foy herself, though she was burned at the stake, supposedly miraculously survived that conflagration. Hollinger’s title plays on the idea of both physical and spiritual corruption and corruptibility, and comes up with some intriguing notions about the pathways to peace, forgiveness, and salvation.

The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall‘s production of Incorruptible, will be performed May 6 (Pay What You Will Open Rehearsal), 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22, 28 and 29 at 8 p.m., and May 9, 16, 23 and 30 at 2 p.m. The show runs two hours with one intermission and is suitable for children 10 and up. Hubbard Hall is located at 25 E. Main St. in Cambridge, NY. Tickets are $20 for Hubbard Hall members, $24 for non-members and $15=20 for students and children. Tickets may be reserved and purchased by calling 518-677-2495

“All My Sons”

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

All My Sons was Arthur Miller’s tenth play, and he had decided that if it was not a reasonable success he would give up playwriting and pursue a different dream.

Imagine, without its success in 1947 there would have been no more Arthur Miller plays after it. No Death of a Salesman, no Crucible, no View from the Bridge. American drama in the second half of the 20th century would have looked and sounded very different indeed.

Miller displays a wonderful clarity of purpose here, exploring issues of loyalty to family and country, the ravages of war at home and on the battlefield, and humankind’s desperate need for community and terror of alone-ness. And, even though Miller claims that he “didn’t understand women very well” when he wrote All My Sons in his early 30’s, he explores these issues equally powerfully from the four disparate points of view of Joe and Kate Keller (in their late 50’s-early 60’s), their 32-year-old son Chris, and Ann Deever, the young woman Chris hopes will become his wife.

The play is set in 1947, the year it premiered on Broadway. Both of Joe and Kate’s sons fought in the Pacific Theatre during the Second World War, and their older son, Larry, who was engaged to Ann, has been missing in action for three years. Kate refuses to accept that he is probably dead and therefore refuses to go along with any engagement between Chris and Ann.

Ann and her brother George grew up in the house across the street from the Kellers, and are the children of Joe’s former business partner, Steve, who is now incarcerated after being held responsible for the shipping of defective airplane parts to the military, causing the death of 21 pilots. As the owner of the plant, Joe also went on trial and spent a short time in jail, but since he was home sick on the day Steve made the decision to ship the parts, he escaped the majority of the blame and has continued to prosper in the post-War economy.

Or at least that is the “truth” Joe and Kate have perpetuated. Whether or not they have succeeded in convincing anyone other than Chris is debatable, but as the play begins this is the status quo. Of the neighbors we meet, possibly only gullible Frank Lubey buys into it. The rest are resigned to allowing the Keller’s façade and reality to coexist. But by the end of the play the return of Ann and George Deever will have brought Joe and Kate’s carefully constructed house of cards tumbling down around them.

While bolstered by fine performances, especially that of Josh Bywater as Chris, the necessary sense of a close, prying neighborhood is utterly lacking in Hubbard Hall’s current production of “All My Sons,” directed by Allen McCullough with assistance from Randolyn Zinn. The neighbors are still there – well all but one, the role of Bert, a small neighborhood child, has been cut – but the neighborhood is missing. Richard Howe has designed one tiny set piece that represents a portion of the front of Joe and Kate’s comfortable suburban home, and he has isolated it in a vast void of black space. Visually, there is no sense of the claustrophobia of being surrounded by watching, judging eyes and ears that is so key to Miller’s tragedy.

“Then the war came along – I was too old to fight but I wanted to do my bit so I made munitions – well I made a fortune too and everybody hates me for it – maybe I did wrong, Annie – but I did the best I knew –”

– Oliver “Daddy” Warbucks in Little Orphan Annie by Harold Gray, 1924

Joe Keller is “Daddy” Warbucks a quarter of a century later, at the tail-end of another World War, dealing with another generation that neither understands nor appreciates what he’s built from, literally, nothing – Joe boasts of a few weeks of night school.

I liked David Braucher’s performance as Joe the least, as I felt failed give the character the geniality and charismatic power necessary to help the audience believe he could have gotten away with what he did – and gotten other people to take the blame. But I think this is a choice that McCullough and his cast must have made, since I felt a similar restraint in Bywater’s Chris, and the two actors play beautifully together as father and son. Except for that minor quibble, Bywater is virtually perfect as Chris, creating the full arc of emotions the character traverses.

And he looks so perfect for the part too. I spent some time trying to fathom why I felt Bywater and Michael Patrick Maloney as Ann’s brother George Deever looked so much more ‘40’s than the rest of the men in the cast, and realized that they had had the courage to get their hair cut short enough. Why the older actors couldn’t have followed suit – I mean, hair does grow back! – I am not quite sure, but if they did make a trip to the barber’s the look of the show would be solidified.

Joan Coombs was a forceful Kate. I have seen the character played as more mentally and emotionally fragile, but McCullough and Coombs have made her a true force of nature. At a period when women were generally dependent on their husbands for financial security and social status, allowing the truth to be known will rob her of everything thing she is.

Ann is cunningly written role, she is a strong woman who has carried an incredible secret in her heart. Once I acclimated myself to Melissa Macleod Herion’s more womanly portrayal – again, this is a role I have seen cast with a more “girlish” actress, even though it is clear from the script that Ann is about 30 – I enjoyed her thoroughly. Her big reveal in the third act was powerfully played.
Both Bywater and Herion bring exceptional physicality to their performances, really allowing you to experience their characters emotions on a visceral level.

I have said that McCullough and Zinn failed to create a sense of neighborhood and community for the Kellers, and that extended into weak performances from the actors cast in the minor roles. Erik Barnum failed to establish the connection between Chris and his character Dr. Jim Bayliss – a connection that is essential in defining the charisma that Chris has inherited from Joe. Nor does Heidi Philipsen, as Jim’s wife Sue, manage the smooth transition between suburban nicety and utter bitchiness that Miller has written for her. Sue is the prototypical “Desperate Housewife” and as the newcomers to the neighborhood – the Baylisses have purchased the Deevers home – she should provide that sense of detached observation that the rest of the community lacks.

Keelye St. John is sweet as Lydia Lubey, George Deever’s teenage flame, now married to Frank. The sole purpose of the character is to anchor George and bring him back under the Kellers’ spell, but she and Michael Patrick Maloney project a very real chemistry that endears them instantly to the audience.

Unfortunately Peter Delocis as Frank is just too big and too loud. I enjoyed his performance very much in Hadrian VII but here he is miscast and seems to wander in for his brief scenes from some 1960’s Neil Simon farce playing next door.

No one takes credit for the costumes, some of which are very good, especially the very attractive dresses career girl Ann sports, and some of which are not quite of the right period.

Although the play was written in three acts, McCullough and Zinn allow only one intermission, between Acts I and II. Not only does this make for a rather long second-half, but the head-long plunge into Act II doesn’t allow Chris’s crisis to settle in to the audience’s conscious.

At the opening night performance I attended an unfortunate weak sound effect at the penultimate moment of the play created a muddled ending. I trust that a louder effect has been instituted for subsequent performances as the feeble noise I heard literally confused and almost destroyed the show’s climax. However, as I watched the final few moments devolve, I thought that something was different from other productions I’d seen. Miller was a stickler for having his scripts performed exactly as written, so I did some investigation and I discovered that the hardback edition published in 1947 and the more contemporary acting edition of the script that I own have slightly different endings. Hubbard Hall is using the acting edition, as they should, and undoubtedly the change was instituted by Miller himself.

Arthur Miller was born in 1915 and at the time this play was first produced he was 32, exactly the same age as the character Chris, a member of that generation of “sons” who went to war – although Miller actually didn’t. He was exempted from military service in World War II due to an old football injury, but that didn’t stop him from developing the strong anti-war sentiments Chris expresses here. Those opinions, and the his running rant against “The American Dream” which he begins here and continues in his next play “Death of a Salesman” were what got him called before the HUAC and blacklisted. The HUAC was the ultimate prying neighbor.

Miller actually began writing All My Sons in 1941, but I cannot imagine the plot working in a wartime setting. 1947 is perfectly situated close enough to the end of the hostilities for them to still be fresh in people’s minds, and just on the verge of the post-war Baby Boom affluence and McCarthyism of the 1950’s.

The questions Miller raises about individual and corporate responsibility and of familial and patriotic loyalty certainly resonate today. In fact the play makes you long for a “neighborhood” that watched and judged and demanded accountability. Who lives next door to the Enron scoundrels, the mortgage giants, and the manufacturers of Chinese dry wall? Who takes responsibility for the misery they create? Attention must be paid!

The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall presents All My Sons on April 1 (pay what you will/open rehearsal), April 2, 3, 9, 10, 16, 17, 23 and 24 at 8 p.m., and April 4, 11, 18 and 25 at 2 p.m. Tickets are $20 for Hubbard Hall members, $24 for non-members and $15 for students and children. Tickets may be reserved and purchased by calling (518) 677-2495. The show runs two hours and twenty minutes and is suitable for ages 13 and up.

Hubbard Hall is an historic opera house located at 25 E. Main St. in Cambridge, NY. For information, visit www.hubbardhall.org.

“Hadrian VII”

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

“Wafted by a favouring gale
As one sometimes is in trances,
To a height that few can scale,
Save by long and weary dances;
surely, never had a male
Under such like circumstances
So adventurous tale
Which may rank with most romances.”

- W.S. Gilbert, The Mikado

Doug Ryan in the title role of "Hadrian VI"" at the Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall. Photo: Hazel KoziolIn Peter Luke’s 1968 play Hadrian VII** a miserable little man named Frederick William Rolfe* (Doug Ryan) makes a startling and meteoric rise from abject poverty in a squalid bedsitter in London to the Throne of St. Peter in Rome, becoming Pope Hadrian VII. Once on the Holy See, he issues revolutionary edicts to bring the Church more in line with the teachings of Jesus. This makes him unpopular to the point where he is assassinated – in the church just like St. Thomas á Becket and Archbishop Óscar Romero.

Then in one of those crummy tricks of defantasification*** that the 20th century loved so well, we learn in the last scene that the whole thing has merely been a story that Rolfe has been writing.

John Hadden has mounted an exciting production of this challenging and often downright baffling play, which, for those very reasons, along with the demands of the title role, is rarely produced. He has used the available talent at the Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall, along with the space in the Hall’s new Freight Depot Theatre, to their best advantage. He gets really thrilling performances from Ryan in the title role, from Richard Howes as reactionary Ulsterman and journalist Jeremiah Sant, and from Hubbard Hall newcomer Peter Delocis as Dr. Talacryn, Bishop of Caerleon, Agnes Dixon, Rolfe’s London cleaning lady, and the First Bailiff . Offering solid support are Kim Johnson Turner as Rolfe’s landlady Nancy Crowe, and Benjie White as Dr. Courtleigh, Cardinal Archbishop of Pimlico and the Second Bailiff.

I enjoyed myself thoroughly, but I cannot imagine what someone walking in off the street would make of the proceedings. I try to warn my Gentle Readers when shows require “homework” and Hadrian VII definitely falls into that category. You will enjoy it more if, at the very least, you read the Wikipedia entry for Frederick Rolfe (1830-1913). If you want to delve deeper, I have included a bibliography at the end of this review. These books are relatively accessible through the miracle of electronic interlibrary loan and/or abebooks.com.

Luke based his play on the 1904 novel Hadrian the Seventh and other works by Rolfe, who also went by the title Baron Corvo, along with a host of other pseudonyms. Born an Anglican, Rolfe converted to Roman Catholicism at the age of 26, and from then until his death futilely sought ordination to the priesthood, incurring notorious debts in the process. He often went by Fr. Rolfe, shortening his first name to be identical with the abbreviation for “Father,” the title that priests commonly use, in order to confuse and defy.

While there is no doubt that Rolfe’s work was highly autobiographical, he did choose a different name, another pseudonym if you will, for his protagonist, calling him George Arthur Rose. Luke calls his protagonist Frederick William Rolfe, and assigns Rose to the character of a young seminarian (played here by Ben Katagiri), deemed, as Rolfe was, to have “no vocation,” who Hadrian VII takes on as his private Chaplain.

Confused yet? Don’t worry, you’ll stay that way through most of this review. The most difficult distinction to make here is when I am referring to Luke’s fictional Rolfe and when I am referring to the real one, especially when, as in the paragraph above, a statement applies to both. The subtitle of A.J.A. Symons’ 1934 “experiment in biography” The Quest for Corvo: Genius or Charlatan sums up quite neatly the central question of Luke’s play: Who the heck was this guy?

What Hadden has mounted at Hubbard Hall is not exactly what Luke wrote. The script is performed verbatim, but the stage directions and character descriptions are largely ignored. There are pros and cons to this. Every director and cast must make a play their own, and a lot has changed since the show was first presented in 1968, but there are sins of omission here that I quibble with.

First, Luke’s Rolfe is very definitely an Englishman – only the second such to sit on the Throne of St. Peter, hence his choice of the name Hadrian, after the only other English Pope, Hadrian or Adrian IV (c. 1100–1159) who started a whole pile of trouble when he handed over Ireland to King Henry II of England – a very important point as it is an irate Irish Protestant who assassinates Rolfe’s Pope. While Hadden has some actors affect “foreign” accents, including the Irishman, all of the English characters speak with American accents.

Another thing Luke makes clear is that Rolfe is a very nervous, compulsive man who chain smokes, continually rolling his own cigarettes “tucking the ends in with a pencil.” He carries a penknife “with which he prepares his apples, sharpens his pencils, etc.” He is “myopic and can hardly see without his plain, steel-rimmed spectacles.” I am quoting from Luke’s note, included in the published edition of the script and I assume in the acting edition too, entitled A Note on the Appearance/Behaviorisms of Rolfe/Hadrian. Hadden and Ryan choose to ignore almost all of these physical quirks. Granted, times have changed and smoking on stage, is now considered decidedly un-PC and would be unpleasant in as small a space as the Freight Depot Theatre, but another compulsive behavior could have been substituted. And why no glasses?

But Hadden and Ryan have uncovered their own interpretation of the lead role, and it works quite well. Ryan can be very, very funny, and there are plenty of opportunities here for him to prove that, but Rolfe/Hadrian is complex role that allows Ryan to display his ability to be more than just a clown. His shifts from Papal pomposity to schizoid paranoia are visceral and breathtaking.

One of Hadden’s tweaks to the original which works brilliantly is the triple-casting of Delocis so that he is almost always on stage with Ryan, like embodiment of one of Rolfe’s many personalities. Delocis has a background in improvisation and sketch comedy that stands him in good stead here as he changes costumes and genders at lightning speed. His second act appearance as Agnes was a comic highlight that literally stopped the show as the audience gave Delocis a round of applause. That break actually worked to his advantage, as it granted him a few more seconds to change back into his clerical robes and reappear almost immediately as Dr. Talacryn.

In his director’s notes in the program, Hadden relates a false memory he had that Rolfe was in a strait jacket in an insane asylum, not in a shabby London bed-sit, while he wrote his Papal Fantasy. That was the impression that the play had left on him and one he incorporates intriguingly here, with the help of Costume Designer Karen Koziol, by having the sleeves of Rolfe/Hadrian’s papal robes unfurl to reveal the long arms and hardware of a strait jacket and a strategic moment.

Koziol’s costumes are worth a mention as they are simultaneously simple and witty in design. I loved that the hems of the robes worn by the various cardinals and archbishops devolved into lace tablecloths or fringed draperies, as if, like Carol Burnett’s Starlett O’Hara, they saw them in the window and just couldn’t resist.

No one is credited with the simple and unobtrusive set, and at the performance I saw I fear that Greg Howe rather mangled Jason Dolmetsch’s lighting design.

The play is performed in three-quarters round, and I chose to sit on the side quite near the back wall of the performing area. If there was ever a play to be viewed sideways, it is Hadrian VII. But I was both pleased and impressed as the evening wore on, to discover that sitting where I did really popped the performance into 3-D, without the need for any silly paper glasses or CGI effects. We so often look at theatre like a flat screen – a necessity in a large, proscenium house – and it takes a skilled director and cast to present a production that can really be enjoyed when viewed from three different directions without getting the slightly dizzying effect of the actors perpetually rotating on their axes, as you do at the Mac-Haydn. I found that I was always seeing faces, not just the backs of heads and ears, and enjoyed the feeling that, from where I was sitting, I was privy to glances and moments that no one else could see – a sense shared by everyone else in the theatre.

My last quibble is Hadden’s decision to perform the play without an intermission. From reading the first half of Double Bill, Alec McCowen’s 1980 biographical account of preparing and performing the lead role in Hadrian VII as well as his acclaimed solo show St. Mark’s Gospel, it is clear that Luke’s script underwent a series of cuts and transformations before emerging in its present form It is also clear that that original staging clearly had an intermission between Luke’s two acts, dividing Rolfe’s life up to his call to “accept pontificality” from his reign as Pope. Here Hadden charges through the whole script in 95 intermission-less minutes. I have to say that I missed that interval. I think it would have engendered a necessary sense of suspense.

Nearly a half-century has elapsed since Luke wrote Hadrian VII. The world has changed. The Catholic Church has changed. It is interesting to look at where things were and where they are and how that change occurred, but I have to ask why, after two thousand plus years of wrong, is the Roman Catholic Church continually surprised and appalled when people criticize it? The complaints haven’t changed very much over the millennia either. It is ironic that one of the major changes Rolfe’s Hadrian suggests – selling off the Vatican treasure – has in fact been implemented, but only because the Church needs the money to pay for the litigation in the multitudinous clergy sex abuse cases it is currently facing…sigh…

When I reviewed Sweet Storm in the Freight Depot Theatre a few weeks ago, I complained about the lack of a path to the theatre from the parking lot, necessitating a lot of slithering over black ice. This time I was pleased to see that a clear path around the ongoing construction had been shoveled, but as we set off down it my companion remarked, “I’m glad I’m with you because I never would have found this place.” Ummmm, that’s not what a theatre hoping to attract an audience wants to hear. Maybe some illuminated signage, not just from the parking lot to the theatre but from East Main Street/ Route 372 as well, would be in order?

The Theatre Company of Hubbard Hall’s production of Hadrian VII runs through March 7 in the Freight Depot Theater, located behind the Hall itself, which is on East Main Street (Rt. 372) in Cambridge, NY. Performances are scheduled at 8 p.m. on February 18 (pay what you will), 19, 20, 26, 27 and March 5 and 6, and February 21 and 28 and March 7 at 2 p.m. The show runs 95 minutes with no intermission and is definitely not for children. Tickets are $18 for TCHH season subscribers, $20 for Hubbard Hall members, $24 for non-members, and $15 for students. Tickets may be reserved and purchased by calling (518) 677-2495.

* The “L” in Rolfe is silent. The name rhymes with “oaf.”

** While the titles of Rolfe’s novel and Luke’s play sound the same when spoken, they are written differently. The novel is “Hadrian the Seventh” while the play is “Hadrian VII.”

*** Rolfe loved to make up big fancy words, so I have invented one of my own in his honor. Defantastification is the act of turning a fantasy story into a dream, a la the 1939 MGM film musical of The Wizard of Oz. In Baum’s original fantasy novel, Dorothy Gale really does go to Oz. In Rolfe’s novel Hadrian the Seventh his protagonist, George Arthur Rose, really does become Pope. Luke has defantastified the story. My point here is that as the 20th century wore on, society as a whole became much more fixated on marking a clear line between “fantasy” and “reality,” as if that were really possible.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hadrian VIII by Peter Luke (1968)

Hadrian the Seventh by Fr. Rolfe (1904)

The Quest for Corvo: Genius or Charlatan? by A. J. A. Symons (1934)

Double Bill by Alec McCowen (1980)

“Seascape”

Sunday, March 1st, 2009

Reviewed by Gail M. Burns, March 2009

My invitation to my companion at Seascape read as follows: “Would you like to come with me to Hubbard Hall on Friday night to see Doug Ryan play a giant lizard?” This is how you can tell your real friends from the phonies. The ones who reply to that question with: “Sure, what time will you pick me up?” are the keepers.

There are giant lizards in Seascape. Giant, English-speaking semi-aquatic lizards. Two of them – a male, Leslie (Ryan) and a female, Sarah (Courtney King). There are also a couple of average long-married humans – well, as average as upper-middle-class WASP Americans get – Charlie (Richard Howe) and Nancy (Stephanie Moffett Hynds), facing retirement.

You will not be surprised to learn that playwright Edward Albee was at a low-point in his career and drinking heavily at the time he wrote and directed Seascape. You will be surprised to learn that he won his second Pulitzer for it.

Not that Seascape isn’t a good play – it is a refreshingly light and charming work from a playwright whose whole demeanor is dark and lowering. Looking at the photographs of Albee in the excellent 1999 biography by Mel Gussow, I was struck to see how infrequently he was caught smiling. He would smile if he saw Doug Ryan as a giant lizard.

Seascape started life in the mid-1960’s as an idea Albee had for a pair of short plays entitled Life and Death. Life became Seascape and Death became All Over. All Over was finished and performed first – to disastrous reviews on both sides of the Atlantic.

Seascape was the first of Albee’s major works that he directed himself. It had a lengthy period of out-of-town try-outs before opening on Broadway in 1975, during which Albee made radical changes to the script, cutting the work from three acts to two. In the current Hubbard Hall production directed by Laura Heidinger, whose performance as Sonya in TCHH’s 2007 production of Uncle Vanya remains one of my favorites, there is no intermission between Acts I and II and the play flows seamlessly as a 90-minute piece.

The act Albee excised was the second, in which the lizards take the humans down into their underwater world, which leaves the play high and dry in more senses than one. We see things from the comfortable homocentric point of view. The lizards remain the outsiders, the others, who must evolve and adapt to our world. Charlie mentions that there were creatures who came up out of the ocean and then returned to it (ever looked at the finger bones of a whale?) I wish Albee had explored the possibility that the course of evolution might run that way again and that there were positive paths for life on earth to take that weren’t towards bipedal, air-breathing, high-tech human society.

But he doesn’t. Ultimately, Seascape is about what every Albee play is about – couples communicating. And here they communicate quite well. Comparisons have been made to Albee’s best-known work Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? because both plays center on a single meeting between two heterosexual couples, but really the similarity ends there. Albee has been quoted as saying that if he wanted Seascape to be a rehash of the themes in …Virginia Woolf? he would have titled it Who’s Afraid of Two Green Lizards?

In contrast to the vituperative George and Martha, Charlie and Nancy are genuinely affectionate and committed to one another. They are also the parents of three very real grown-up children and doting grandparents. For the majority of Act I they sit on the beach and discuss the empty-nest post-retirement phase of their lives together, for which they have very different ambitions. The dialogue is delightfully normal and relatable. Driving home, my companion and I discovered we had both seen a lot of ourselves in Nancy, but we each saw our own husbands in Charlie, and we could not be married to two more different men. Which proves that most long-married folks will find something to identify with in this couple.

Howe is the master of playing the repressed, middle-aged WASP husband. It is easy for any other actor sharing the stage with Ryan to be overshadowed by his bold skills in physical comedy, but Howe is every bit Ryan’s equal in that regard, except that where Ryan’s physicality is painted in broad strokes, Howe’s is a portrait in miniature. Watch Howe at work and there will never be a time when his body isn’t telling you much more about the inner workings of the often laconic characters he plays than the lines the playwright has given him.

Hynds is an excellent match for him. They look every inch the perfect WASP couple entering retirement. Nancy is still a beauty, and obviously younger than Charlie by perhaps as much as a decade. While Charlie has had his career out in the world, much of Nancy’s life has been devoted to homemaking and child-rearing. She is not ready to sit and do nothing, go nowhere, for the rest of her life. When she speaks about the time when she was 30 and he was in a deep depression and she considered having an affair, you know she is signaling her current restless nature and warning Charlie to meet her at least half-way or else…

As Nancy and Charlie bicker and natter on the sands, a face suddenly pops over the sand dunes behind them. And it is a face unlike any you have seen before. Costume designer Karen Koziol deserves a standing ovation for her work, not just for the amazingly effective costumes that transform Ryan and King into giant lizards, but for the perfectly understated beach garb of Howe and Hynds.

I will not attempt to describe the lizard costumes, other than to tell you that my companion referred to them as “elegantly engineered.” I cannot write about this play without divulging that two of the characters are lizards, but I can keep how astoundingly that transformation is executed a secret. You HAVE to go and see for yourself.

Albee is absolutely clear that intended Leslie and Sarah to be as real as Charlie and Nancy: “Just as civilized in their own way, just as middle-class…Certainly Leslie and Sarah must be frightening and must very clearly be true lizards…[they] are a metaphor, but they must be as real as possible.”

Despite my joke earlier about Albee’s drinking, and Charlie’s insistence that Leslie and Sarah only appear because he and Nancy are dead from eating tainted liver-paste sandwiches, the lizard couple are very much alive and real. Heidinger, Ryan, and King have done a superb job of making them believable creatures. When I saw Ryan in the title role of The Elephant Man at TCHH in 2007 I thought how sore he must have been from holding his body in that distorted position for so many hours of rehearsal and performance, but this role trumped that completely. Ryan and King walk and move like lizards, maintaining a crouching, second-position plie stance while bipedal. On all fours, using the ballet turn-out and the bent knees of the plie, they are able to create the illusion that their limbs are rotated away from their torsos, in a true reptilian stance, rather than being centered beneath them, as is common in mammalian quadrupeds. It must hurt like hell. They do get to wear knee pads.

Albee is clear that Leslie and Sarah do not have externally visible sex organs, so Koziol has built ingenious gender makers into the costumes to differentiate male and female. And Heidinger and Albee give Ryan and King easily identifiable gender stereotypes for the characters. Leslie is impulsive and angry, quick to defend his territory, which includes Sarah. Sarah is calmer and therefore more open and inquisitive. Charlie and Nancy mirror these attributes.

So, was it wonderful fun to see Doug Ryan play a giant lizard? Hell, yes! Ryan delivers another profoundly comic performance that is simultaneously poignant and hilarious. But as I have made clear there is not a weak link in this cast. In the original Broadway production Frank Langella took home a Tony for his portrayal of Leslie, but he also earned the wrath of Albee and his castmates for hamming it up and stealing scenes in what should be an ensemble show. Heidinger and her cast keep things well balanced and the humor and pathos is well distributed among the players.

The opening night of Seascape was also the first public performance in Hubbard Hall’s new Black Box theatre in the Depot Building. Hubbard Hall Executive Director Benjie White was obviously deeply moved to see this long-held dream become a reality and in his curtain speech spoke with pride of the many hours volunteers and staff had invested in the space. It is a cozy space, seating about 58. It will function not just as a theatre but as an art gallery and “function room.” White said he is looking forward to sitting out on the loading dock (aka the deck) with a cup of coffee waiting for the train to come by, which you will be glad to hear only happens on Tuesdays and Wednesdays and not in the middle of the performance.

I consider TCHH’s 1878 wooden opera house to be one of my favorite performance spaces in the whole universe (and I’ve been in a bunch of them) so I can’t say that this new space is an improvement, but it is a nice space and it works well for this production. It did get rather hot and stuffy in there as the performance progressed, but I think that was just an opening night glitch that will soon be worked out. It was one of those early spring nights when it was just too cold to keep the doors open but just too warm to keep them closed.Ah, spring in New England…

The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall’s production of Seascape runs March 26 through April 19 at Hubbard Hall, 25 East Main Street in Cambridge, NY. The show runs 90-minutes with no intermission and is suitable for ages 12 and up. There is some sex talk, but its very mild. I just think younger kids will be bored listened to a bunch of old married people chatter for 90-minutes. Tickets are $20 for Hubbard Hall members, $24 for non-members, and $15 for students. For information and reservations, call 518-677-2495.

copyright Gail M. Burns, 2009

“The Good Doctor”

Saturday, November 1st, 2008

Once I went to a ridiculously trendy restaurant and saw on the menu an exotic dish made with all the foods I like best in the world. I ordered it and discovered that when you put all the foods I like best in the world into one dish, it tastes terrible. What I loved, and still love, individually, I hated in combination.

The same applies to The Good Doctor, an unholy marriage of the considerable talents of Neil Simon (1927- ) and Anton Chekhov (1860-1904) currently being presented by the Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall (TCHH). The two men never coexisted on this planet, so the idea, and the fault, lies entirely with Simon, who is credited as playwright here.

I do not fault Simon for loving Chekhov, or for finding his work funny. If Simon, who has a Broadway theatre named after him for Lord’s sake, wanted to throw his considerable resources into producing Chekhov’s work, I would be the first in line to buy tickets. But to try to combine his work with Chekhov’s is an unpardonable sin.

Chekhov and Simon have a lot in common, most notably that they both were/are compulsive writers. The title plays on another similarity the two writers share – Chekhov was a doctor, and Simon is called Doc. Simon has frequently been called in as a “Show Doctor” to save ailing scripts. While Simon casts his narrator here as an obsessed writer, seemingly of Chekhov’s place and period (late 19th century Russian), the character is NOT a doctor. Just which “Good Doctor” are we celebrating here?

Simon takes his material from Chekhov’s short stories, not his plays, and even the Good Show Doctor cannot translate the pieces successfully from prose to drama. You feel as if you are being read aloud to. And Simon crams in ten, count ‘em, ten, short stories where six or seven would have easily sufficed.

There is a rhythm to Simon’s punch lines which resonate with 20th and 21st century Americans because they are born of his early years writing for television. Simon writes in the rhythm and idiom of the sitcom and sketch comedy (he penned both Sergeant Bilko and Sid Cesar’s Your Show of Shows) I doubt that Chekhov could have held a job writing for American television. The rhythms of 19th century Russian humor bear no resemblance to Simon’s, which is why modern American audiences have such a hard time finding Chekhov funny. The result is that you can instantly tell which author wrote which lines.

This is a long way of saying that The Good Doctor is a bad script, and when you have a bad script no amount of talent or money can save you. If you send Sir Laurence Olivier out on to a stage with rotten floorboards he is still going to fall through into the basement. Director Brian Foley has assembled a cast of Hubbard Hall’s finest performers – Jason Dolmetsch, Kim Johnson-Turner, Doug Ryan, Anastasia Satterthwaite, and Benjie White – and they ply their winning ways the best they can, but they can’t transform straw into gold.

This is being billed as the first TCHH production since the departure of founding artistic director Kevin McGuire, although McGuire selected the script and invited Foley to direct. All involved agree that Neil Simon is not typical TCHH fare – the company has built its reputation on productions of Shaw, Shakespeare, and, yes, Chekhov, with the occasional musical thrown in for good measure. Simon is seen as the purview of summer stock and dinner theatre, even though he is a Pulitzer Prize winner and many of his plays have serious themes.

Foley is a trained clown. Along with Matthew Duncan he travels the world performing as one half of Circus Bambouk (Duncan is Bam, Foley is Bouk). McGuire told Foley he wanted The Good Doctor directed like a Mack Sennett (1880-1960) comedy. I don’t think Chekhov would have had a very long career writing for Sennett either. So Foley brings a third style to the mix.

The Good Doctor has no through story, it is just a collection of Chekhov’s short stories loosely tied together by the ramblings of the Narrator (Brian Gillespie.) Gillespie, who has worked with Foley in the past, is making his Hubbard Hall debut. All the rest of the cast were regular TCHH performers under McGuire, but they all work well together as a team. Gillespie gets to take on a few other roles – notably that of The Great Seducer of Married Women, where he is winningly paired with Ryan as the clueless husband and the glowing Satterthwaite as the cleverer-than-she-looks wife. Alas, this entertaining but lengthy piece is placed at the end of the too-long first act.

Ryan and Gillespie team again in the second act for The Drowned Man which shows Ryan’s comedic skills to great effect and proves Gillespie an excellent straight man. Ryan is less happily paired with Dolmetsch in The Surgery, a “comedy” about dental pain and tooth extraction that I found excruciating in every way but funny.

Dolmetsch has his best moments as the sneezer in The Sneeze and as the impossibly naïve 19-year-old Chekhov in The Arrangement. In this latter piece Simon’s additions to the script were so obvious that a fellow audience member behind me leaned over and whispered to his companion “That was the Neil Simon part.”

Satterthwaite shines in The Seduction and as a feverish but determined actress who auditions by playing all Olga, Masha, and Irina in a scene from Chekhov’s Three Sisters. Johnson-Turner has her funniest moment as the title character in A Defenseless Creature as a woman who is anything but defenseless as she torments Ryan’s gout-ridden bank clerk into writing her a check.

White is always a pleasure to see on stage, even in very small roles to which he is often relegated because his time is mostly taken up being the Executive Director of Hubbard Hall Projects. Here he gets a solid bit as the increasingly enraged sneezee in The Sneeze and in a delightful cameo as an inquisitive voyeur in The Seduction.

Now, as if there isn’t enough going on here, there are a couple of songs. This isn’t a musical – a Chekhovian musical would be a terrible thing to behold – and I am not quite sure why Too Late for Happiness and Chekhovian Depression are in there (no one is credited with writing the tunes.) The former is quite a delightful little duet on the subject of later life love, ably performed by Johnson-Turner and White, while the latter is an ensemble number that opens the second act. As its title implies, Chekhovian Depression pokes fun at the unrelentingly morose gloom which many Americans associate with Russian literature in general and Chekhov in particular. Are we celebrating Chekhov here or making fun of him? Make up your mind already.

While Chekhov did write funny stories and referred to his plays as comedies, not everything he wrote was light-hearted, and some of the stories included here, notably The Sneeze (also known as The Death of a Government Clerk) and The Governess, are downright tragic. The Drowned Man has quite a horrific ending, although it does garner a laugh, and The Arrangement is downright maudlin.

The set by Alley Morse consists of scribbled on paper everywhere. It is embedded into the floor, it paves the stairs, it climbs up the proscenium arch. The implication, both implicit and explicit in Gillespie’s opening monologue, is that this is a man who just can’t stop writing. Whether we assume that man to be Anton Chekhov or Neil Simon is immaterial, the description applies to both, but no matter how great the writer, not every word s/he writes will be worth reading or performing. The Good Doctor is lesser Chekhov adapted into lesser Neil Simon. Both these men were/are capable of so much, but you’d never guess it from this script. Next time TCHH decides to present Neil Simon, I hope they pick The Odd Couple (my personal fav) or his Pulitzer Prize-winning “Lost in Yonkers.

The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall’s production of The Good Doctor runs through December 7 at Hubbard Hall, 25 East Main Street in Cambridge, NY, with performances on November 14, 15, 21, 22, 28, 29 and December 5 and 6 at 8 p.m., and November 16, 23, 30 and December 7 at 2 p.m. The show runs two and a half hours with one intermission and is suitable for the whole family. Tickets are $20 for Hubbard Hall members, $24 for non-members and $15 for students. For information and reservations, call 518-677-2495.

copyright Gail M. Burns, 2008

“Cosi fan Tutte”

Friday, August 1st, 2008

Let me state right up front that I know NOTHING about opera. While they have the same roots and opera is very theatrical, it is not theatre. There are big differences between what we now call opera and what Variety calls “Legit” theatre.

So why did you go to see Cosi fan Tutte and why are you writing about it now? Well, because I was curious, and because I was excited by the idea of seeing an opera performed in Hubbard Hall. I also wanted to see if an opera would FIT in Hubbard Hall!

Hubbard Hall is called an “opera house” and not so long ago most towns in this region had one. They were all-purpose public gathering places, usually on an upper floor with retail space on the street level. This allowed for additional income and, since hot air rises, helped heat the performance space. There are not too many of them standing anymore. Hubbard Hall (circa 1878) is the only one left in Washington County and is a perfect example of a rural opera house. The Troy Savings Bank Music Hall (circa 1870) and the Cohoes Music Hall (circa 1874) are perfect examples of an urban ones. If you want to see one on a very small scale, visit the Hancock (MA) Town Hall.

Benjie White, executive director of Hubbard Hall Projects, noted that theatre was a dirty word back in the Victorian era, whereas “opera” and “music” were considered wholesome and refined arts, so while these buildings were essentially theatres, they were called opera houses or music halls to make it possible for ladies to attend their offerings. (Only “loose women” went to the theatre!)

So while it is tempting to crow that opera has finally returned to the opera house, in fact Hubbard Hall was not really built to accommodate opera as we understand it today. We use the word opera to refer almost exclusively to Grand Opera, and we associate the art form with enormous halls (so large that “opera glasses” are required to see the stage) and lavish sets and costumes. The first production in Hubbard Hall was the Gilbert & Sullivan operetta H.M.S. Pinafore (probably a pirated version) and that is about the largest spectacle that the space can accommodate.

Cosi fan Tutte, which premiered in Vienna in 1790, has a very grand Mozart score but it is a little “chamber opera” by modern standards. Gilbert & Sullivan’s works are big in comparison. It is one of three operas Mozart wrote with librettist Lorenzo da Ponte – the other two being Le Nozze di Figaro (currently being presented by the Berkshire Opera Company at the Colonial Theatre in Pittsfield, MA) and Don Giovanni. There are only six major roles and the chorus has been eliminated in this production. There is a 25-piece orchestra, which is large by my ‘legit” theatre standards, but modest by operatic ones. In other words, Cosi fan Tutte is a perfect fit in Hubbard Hall.

In order to be able to give you some idea of the quality of this production, I took along as my “date” a friend who speaks Italian, loves opera, and invests a lot of her time and energy traveling to attend performances. I can tell you that the music sounded good to me, that everyone and everything was on key, and that I had a lot of fun, but whether or not those three things added up to good opera I wasn’t at all sure.

So after the finale and the two standing ovations for the cast and orchestra, I turned to my friend and asked, “So, was that good opera?” And she replied, “That was WONDERFUL opera!” So there you have it from someone who knows.

As I suspected, one of things that made my friend rate this production as “wonderful” was the intimacy of the space. You just don’t get to see opera up close and personal like this. It is always big, big, big – big house, big sets, big voices. One of my fears was that big operatically trained voices would blow out everyone’s eardrums at close quarters, but even when the singers were literally close enough to touch the sound balance was good.

You never know where you are going to be sitting at Hubbard Hall – sometimes on the floor, sometimes on the stage, sometimes on risers. This time the audience is on the stage and on risers three-quarters round the performance area, which is on the floor in front of the overhang of the balcony. The balcony cannot be used for audience seating because it is not handicap accessible, but it is used here as performance space, representing the ladies’ private quarters.

The orchestra is on the floor tucked under the balcony behind the set, and so three TV screens behind the audience project conductor Richard Giarusso for the singers. This configuration not only allows for maximum seating and performance space, but contains the sound of the orchestra so that it isn’t overwhelming in the small space. And it means that you are watching Giarusso and the orchestra as you watch the show.

That is if you are not consumed by the supertitles, displayed here on the front edge of the balcony. I don’t know how I feel about sub- and supertitles. I know that they are ubiquitous in opera – when I went to Lake George Opera to see The Pirates of Penzance earlier this summer they were in use, and that is a piece written and performed in English – but I do find them distracting. However one of the big differences between opera and legit theatre is that in opera the performers are called singers and in the theatre they are called actors, even if they sing. Opera is all about the music – plot is highly incidental. The singer’s primary instrument is his/her voice. Actors are trained to use voice, face, and body to convey emotion and plot. I don’t think I could have figured out just from watching the singers here, the intricacies of what was going on. And I don’t speak a word of Italian. So I have to concede that supertitles were indeed a necessary evil.

The above is not a criticism of these performers’ abilities, but an observation on the different performance styles required by opera and theatre.

The plot of Cosi fan Tutte is considerably less ridiculous than many operas, musicals, and plays I could name. Director Dianna Heldman has moved the time of the action from the Mozart’s 18th century to about 1910, but kept the setting in Naples. Ferrando (Brian Tanner) and Guglielmo (Richard Mazzaferro) are soldiers betrothed respectively to Fiordilgi (Roza Tulyaganova) and Donnabella (Kara Cornell) , who are sisters. Don Alfonso (Ivan Amaro), described as an old philosopher, bets the soldiers that their fiancées will not be faithful to them if tested. The soldiers take him up on the bet, and announce to their ladies that their regiment has been called to battle. After a tearful farewell, Ferrando and Guglielmo reappear in disguise as Albanians and woe each others’ intended. Don Alfonso takes the sisters’ maid, Despina (Alexina Jones) into his confidence so that she will not give away the plot, and she agrees to help him win the bet.

Because Donnabella and Fiordiligi are apparently stupid as rocks and unable to recognize each other’s fiancés in disguise, they fall for the ruse and marry their Albanian lovers, who of course reveal their true identities, much to the women’s horror. But the marriages were not binding since the notary was merely Despina in disguise, and Don Alfonso encourages everyone to move forward, forgiving the past, and to be more realistic in the future about the nature and limits of human love.

Heldman also allows us to wonder a bit in the final tableaux just how cozy these two marriages will be, since it is clear that each sister finds both men attractive.

It was Jones, a coloratura soprano who moved to White Creek four years ago with her husband Jason Dolmetsch, who dreamed of staging an opera at Hubbard Hall. Dolmetsch and Jones had appeared in productions with The Theatre Company at Hubbard Hall and so were familiar with the space and the workings of the organization. When Jones approached White and the Hubbard Hall Projects’ board, they said, “If you want to do an opera, do an opera.” So the Hubbard Hall Opera Theatre (HHOT) was born.

Of course it was not easy. Jones put in a lot of hard work and was fortunate to acquire Giarusso and Heldman, along with White and the board, as collaborators early on. Auditions in New York City brought out 65 singers, and Jones, Heldman, and Giarusso were able to find this superb cast – I will not quote all their credentials here but I encourage you to read your program carefully – who were in turn willing to work for small salaries in exchange for the opportunity to perform this work in such an intimate and unique space. Giarusso, a Williams college graduate who has lived and worked in western Massachusetts for many years, recruited an orchestra made up primarily of local professionals, who were again excited to be part of this experience.

But that “can do” attitude of the Hubbard Hall Projects board and administration continues to be what makes the Hall such an exciting and impressive community arts organization. My opera-loving friend said she thought the singers in Cosi fan Tutte were better than some she had heard at Tanglewood this past season. Tanglewood is all about Tanglewood. Hubbard Hall is all about art and artists and community. I attended the opening night of Cosi fan Tutte with a full house of the usual eclectic mix of folks that I always see at the Hall. They are not there to be seen but to see and experience whatever is on offer – opera, theatre, chamber music, folk music, cabaret – and they delight in its quality and availability.

As gas prices rise and Americans focus more on returning to our roots of self-sufficiency, I think we will see live entertainment return to the 19th century model of bringing art to the people, rather than the people to the art, for which venues like Hubbard Hall were built. We are already seeing that with the restoration of late-19th and early-20th-century houses throughout the region, forming a new “circuit” through which packaged entertainment travels – the Warner Theatre in Torrington, CT; the Mahaiwe in Great Barrington; the Colonial in Pittsfield; the Paramount in Rutland, VT; the Palace in Albany; Proctors in Schenectady; and the Colonial in Keene, NH – just to name the ones I list on GailSez. I don’t think we will return to the days when every town had its own “opera house” but I think more communities will start encouraging and creating their own artists, as Hubbard Hall does, and that people will come to depend more on their regional entertainment “hubs” which may then begin to host locally grown productions and acts, as well as national tours.

So even if you, like me, aren’t really an opera person, I encourage you to take the trip to Cambridge, NY, to see this HHOT premiere production. If you have youngsters in your family who like classical music, this would be an excellent and intimate introduction to the glories of opera – something that they will never forget and which may just inspire the next generation of Alexina Joneses who boldly step forward and say, “What this town needs is an opera company.”

Hubbard Hall Opera Theatre’s production of Cosi fan Tutte runs through June 1 at Hubbard Hall, 25 East Main Street in Cambridge, NY, with performances on August 15, 16, 21 and 23 at 8 p.m., and August 24 at 2 p.m. the show runs three hours with one intermission and is suitable for classical music lovers of all ages. Tickets are $25 for Hubbard Hall members, $30 for non-members and $20 for students. For information and reservations, call 518-677-2495.

copyright Gail M. Burns, 2008